Moroni
05-31-2010, 12:18 PM
Announced that the United Nations Mission in Iraq, that the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq in the coming period will affect the security on the body’s ability to provide protection to its employees in Iraq, while some expressed the hope that the support members of the UN Security Council to keep UN mission after a U.S. withdrawal. The head of the United Nations Mission Ed Melkert in a report to the UN Security Council in the twenty-fifth of the month of May to discuss the latest developments in Iraq, said that “the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq will affect the body’s ability to provide adequate protection for their employees,” noting that “equipping Iraqi forces to protect United Nations personnel fully takes some time. “He Mleckert that” this requires a range of options during the period following the withdrawal of U.S. forces including the development of capabilities of the United Nation’s own and greater reliance on internal security forces of Iraq are progressive and seek the support of the United Nations to increase the elements of its contingent in Iraq, “adding that” the possible use of some of the experiences of other security. “The U.S. forces in Iraq withdrew by the end of the month of June in 2009 from all Iraqi cities, and handed over the security file, where the Iraqi security apparatus, under the sofa signed between Baghdad and Washington in 2008, and provides terms of the agreement to hand over all military bases of the U.S. military and the NATO mission according to a schedule expires at the end of 2011, The Convention also reduce the number of U.S. forces in August next to some 50 thousand U.S. troops. He drew the President of the United Nations Mission in Iraq that “the work underway to build a new international organization in Baghdad, after presentation by the Iraqi government to provide land and pay an initial contribution of 25 million dollars for 50% of the shares”, expressing at the same time he hoped to “supporting members of the Board Security to continue and represent the United Nations in Iraq after a U.S. withdrawal. ” Melkert emphasized that “the alternative would be to reduce the representation, which will lead to negative consequences at a time when we still have major tasks to achieve in Iraq.”
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.belagh.com/news.asp%3Fid%3D1%26sId%3D18680&rurl=www.translate.google.com
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.belagh.com/news.asp%3Fid%3D1%26sId%3D18680&rurl=www.translate.google.com